Sorry, I made some mistake by the stange access.log.
More detail here:
refresh_pattern \.gif$ 720 90% 10080 reload-into-ims
Before test I load http://www.atsaico.jp/soft/saga/99012901.jpg into cache.
Use IE:
1. first time
932822266.614 13359 210.67.226.201 TCP_HIT/200 73593 GET http://www.atsai.c o.jp/soft/saga/99012901.jpg - NONE/- image/jpeg
2. press reload
932822319.954 0 210.67.226.201 TCP_IMS_HIT/304 192 GET http://www.atsai .co.jp/soft/saga/99012901.jpg - NONE/- image/jpeg
3. press ctrl-reload
932822340.755 13801 210.67.226.201 TCP_HIT/200 73592 GET http://www.atsai.c o.jp/soft/saga/99012901.jpg - NONE/- image/jpeg
Use Netscape:
1. first time
932823460.394 18641 210.67.226.201 TCP_HIT/200 73594 GET http://www.atsai.c o.jp/soft/saga/99012901.jpg - NONE/- image/jpeg
2. press reload
932823535.955 1000 210.67.226.201 TCP_REFRESH_HIT/304 343 GET http://www.a tsai.co.jp/soft/saga/99012901.jpg - DIRECT/210.143.99.90 image/jpeg
3. press shift-reload
932823638.363 35059 210.67.226.201 TCP_REFRESH_HIT/200 73591 GET http://www .atsai.co.jp/soft/saga/99012901.jpg - DIRECT/210.143.99.90 image/jpeg
Could anyone explain why the logs are so different?
Sylphid
Received on Sat Jul 24 1999 - 07:22:23 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:47:32 MST