Hi again
> > refresh_pattern -i latinmail.com 60 100% 240 reload-into-ims
> > override-lastmod
> >
> It wouldn't surprise me if override-lastmod is making
> a page cacheable which should not be cacheable. The
> only difference between two different users is probably
> the cookie sent, so making the page falsely cacheable
> would likely result in getting other people's mail.
So .. These rules are acceptable? or my intention of not keeping (no
cache) these pages (webmails) is incorrect?
> Sites that use cookies instead of proper HTTP
> authentication (most :-() should use:
>
> Cache-Control: private
I'm using squid 2.2 Stable 1, the option cache-control exists?
> Generally, though, you cannot expect web accesses to
> behave correctly if you set any of the modifiers on
> refresh patterns.
well, the squid can then produce this error of access other peoples
accounts of webmails to use refresh pattern?
thanks
Ubaldo
Received on Thu Jul 22 1999 - 13:05:22 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:47:29 MST