> I thing you are right. I should upgrade it. But the lines before the page
> fault are like that:
Page Faults are a normal part of the operation of the system. This
line is just a piece of statistical information.
> CPU Usage: user 741 sys 1258
> Page faults with physical i/o: 143556
However, 70 page faults per second of CPU time would suggest that the
machine is desperately short of memory, and the stress this imposed
might well have triggered another latent problem. (I get 0.2 on a
486/33, although a faster machine would get more done per second of
CPU time, but 70 a second still makes it very I/O bound.)
-- David Woolley - Office: David Woolley <djw@bts.co.uk> BTS Home: <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> Wallington TQ 2887 6421 England 51 21' 44" N, 00 09' 01" W (WGS 84) Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.Received on Wed Mar 31 1999 - 07:24:13 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:45:37 MST