> Caching of HEAD requests is a side issue with a very low priority
> compared to IMS operations.
While I agree that, assuming the cache has enough knowledge to know
the scope of validity of a 304 response, that would be a better
solution, in the context of a small corporate cache, I can revalidate
entries which were TCP-MISS/304's by scanning the logs and
occasionally running a batch job to refetch them, so having IMS
satisfied from cache would allow me to do this with much less disk
overhead and would probably be a necessary step in a full IMS
strategy, anyway.
>
-- David Woolley - Office: David Woolley <djw@bts.co.uk> BTS Home: <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> Wallington TQ 2887 6421 England 51 21' 44" N, 00 09' 01" W (WGS 84)Received on Thu Nov 05 1998 - 07:32:44 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:42:57 MST