Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches.

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 18:13:52 -0600 (MDT)

On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, B. Richardson wrote:

> I am theorizing that if a large proportion of files are 4k or less,
> then 4k is a better choice for block size than 8k.

What are you trying to optimize?

Alex.
Received on Mon Jul 20 1998 - 17:15:52 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Joe Leung: "Re: Problems with Linux/Squid"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Strangenesses in 1.2beta22"
In reply to: B. Richardson: "Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."
Next in thread: B. Richardson: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."
Reply: B. Richardson: "Re: Optimal filesystem block sizes for caches."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:41:11 MST