On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> At 20:02 02/08/97 +1000, Peter Marelas wrote:
> >
> >We currently have this problem at a National Exchange Point where we have
> >many siblings querying each other over multiple WAN's.
> >
> >The idea I put forward was to "cluster" the siblings in groups of 8 like so:
> >
> >
> > [ 8 cluser sibling ] [ 8 cluster sibling ]
> > x x
> > x x
> > x x
> > [ ICP relay ]
> > x x
> > x x
> > x x
> > [ 8 cluser sibling ] [ 8 cluster sibling ]
>
> Isn't the current thinking to make the ICP relay a parent of the clusters,
> with all the clusters as siblings? The parent wouldn't necesssarily have to
> have any cache space for itself, it could just do the fetching from
> neighbours and pass them back.
>
> Jonathan L.
>
Yes..
But im not sure it will work with the current ICP implementation.
We dont want the ICP relay (Parent) fetching non cached data.
Need to test.
Regards
Peter Marelas
-- Phase One Interactive - Sun Solaris/Unix/Networking Consultant P.O Box 549, Templestowe 3106 Melbourne, Australia URL: http://www.phase-one.com.au/Received on Mon Aug 04 1997 - 21:00:41 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:35:55 MST