>>> tekotago.smtp."dsg@ll.iac.es" 18/December/1996 10:43am
>>>
roger@tekotago.ac.nz wrote:
>> > Hi Frank
>> > We are using both squid and http-gw on our firewall. Squid
is
>> providing the cahcing services while http-gw provides the
>> forwarding or our internal www servers to external sites.
>Hi Roger,
>
> Please, could you explain me in detail more about this?. We
> are planning to install a firewall (TIS-firewall-toolkit) and
> thinking in using a separate host for running squid and using it
> as a proxy for ftp and http instead of the TIS proxies.
> But if I understood what you said, you are running squid *and*
> the firewall in the same host?
This is correct.
> Regards,
> Diego.
I have http-gw configured as per instructions from TIS to answer
requests on port 80 of the firewall. This allow runs as a proxy for
http, ftp and gopher and can allow redirected access to http
servers behind the firewall.
I have squid configured to run on port 3128 as per the default
configuration.
As http-gw and squid are using different ports there are no
conflicts.
Coincidently, I have a httpd running on yet another port to allow
cachemgr.cgi to run.
regards
Roger Gill.
Received on Tue Dec 17 1996 - 15:08:10 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:55 MST