Re: strange LOG_NONE requests

Tom Minchin wrote:
>>
>> Christian Balzer wrote:
>> > >What OSes are people seeing this affect with - we're running Linux 2.0.xx.
>> > >Sounds to me it's either a bug with Squid or with the OS's accept call...
>> > >
>> > OK, common factor so far would be (aside from Squid ;-) Linux, 2.0.latest
>> > here...
>>
>> Linux anaconda 2.0.6 #5 Sat Oct 19 01:05:27 EST 1996 i586
>>
>Linux ns 2.0.23 #1 Mon Oct 21 18:38:27 EST 1996 i586
>
>Remember everyone with 2.0.0 to put in their 'big ping patch'. Nothing
>like having your machine remote frozen/rebooted by some win95 box.
>
Hehehehe, true. Or pray for a quick release of 2.0.24 (which would imply
Linus finding a house soon ^_-).
Funny thing about this W95 ping attack is that is even crashes VMS machines
running UCX.... ^_^;;; ^_-

>I suspect if all LOG_NONE people are linux running, then perhaps Alan
>Cox can probably take a look.
>
True again, would somebody more british than me like the honours of
pointing him to this new problem? ^_-

Mata ne,

<CB>

-- 
  // <CB> aka Christian Balzer, Tannenstr. 23c, D-64342 Seeheim, Germany
\X/  CB@brewhq.swb.de | Voice: +49 6257 83036, Fax/Data: +49 6257 83037
SWB  - The Software Brewery - | Team H, Germany HQ | Anime no Otaku