Hi,
as i read the thread of the SS1000 with 310M and 78MB for In Memory Objects
i was think how effective those in memory caching is. I myself reduced
this in memory objects very much as i think it only consumes memory.
For understanding. These in memory objects are the Ram equivalent for
the swap (HD) storage, correct ? It does no caching for writing to disc
or whatever doesnt it ? So does Squid analyse the hit rate for
in-memory cache seperately somewhere ?
Flo
-- Florian Lohoff mailto:flo@mini.gt.owl.de Phone:+49-5241-340796 Privates Internet Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Guetersloh - http://www.gt.owl.deReceived on Fri Oct 18 1996 - 08:54:19 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:18 MST