> I think Harvest (Squid?) has a different I/O chacteristic
> than a typical newserver setup. I believe for newserver, a
> huge RAID array will be useful to hookup several disks
> into a large disk array. But for Harvest, it might be better
> to use small disk, one swap_dir for each disk.
>
> How do you configure your disks ?
I have used the ccd device driver on FreeBSD systems that allows
software interleaving of drives into a logical drive. Its quiet
neat, but hardward RAID is probably more suited??
> Correct me if I am wrong, difficult to span news directories
> over several disks without RAD
Unless your software supports it :) You could also just mount
different bits of the news spool on different disks, but thats
a bit horrid :) (ie. /var/news/alt /var/news/comp)
> > cut back on the load on your main cache, improve performance
> > for end users, and reduce local network traffic to.
> Would love to try this. But my environment (ISP) doesn't seem
> to allow that.
Our parent ISP runs a netscape cache which runs into their feeders
main cache (i believe) which is also squid. So from me (home) to
the world i have
me -> home machine squid -> hub in town squid ->
our ISP (netscape) -> national backbone ISP squid
> IWe are considering doing such on a international scale
> much like NLNAR.
Only way to go. Now if we could just convince the rest of the
Australian community. I get great web performance because of
squid. My university has massive ATM links to the backbone and
i get better web performance at home.
Regards,
Peter
-- Peter Childs --- http://www.imforei.apana.org.au/~pjchilds Finger pjchilds@al.imforei.apana.org.au for public PGP keyReceived on Sat Aug 10 1996 - 21:39:48 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:32:47 MST