Re: [PATCH] StoreID via eCAP and ICAP

Any examples of a header description would help to understand what is
needed for IANA registration.

Eliezer

On 07/29/2014 11:59 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> The Store-ID header is not registered. I am not
>> >going to write an Internet Draft to describe it, but somebody could try
>> >to submit a_provisional_ Store-ID IANA registration that does not
>> >require a Draft or an RFC AFAICT. However, the header would still need a
>> >description on the web somewhere. Perhaps somebody can volunteer to take
>> >a lead on that?
>> >
>> >Archived-At: This is a registered header that is almost perfect for our
>> >needs. The was worried that other developers would object to using a
>> >completely different name compared to StoreID helpers (and the feature
>> >name itself).
> I'm not worried about the naming. The semantics fit. If you want to use
> this it makes a lot of sense and saves all the work of documenting an
> identical header.
>
> Amos
Received on Tue Jul 29 2014 - 13:09:14 MDT