On 07/14/2014 11:02 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 07/14/2014 03:48 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> - if (!s.valid()) {
>> + if (!s) {
>> // it is possible the call or accept() was still queued when the port was reconfigured
>> debugs(33, 2, "HTTP accept failure: port reconfigured.");
>> return;
> While the port pointer could get invalidated in the [fixed] old code, it
> cannot become nil in the new code. The above comment is no longer valid
> and the code itself no longer works as intended. Please fix both
> instances of the above logic: one in httpAccept() and one in httpsAccept().
... and fixing the httpsAccept() instance will bring trunk closer to a
state when it can actually compile again when SSL is enabled.
Alex.
> AFAICT, if you simply replace the above code with a comment warning that
> the port may no longer be in the current configuration, we will continue
> to start transactions previously accepted on no longer configured ports.
> Hopefully, this will not cause any new problems, but there may be a
> better solution.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.
>
Received on Tue Jul 15 2014 - 03:53:49 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 15 2014 - 12:00:14 MDT