On 07/11/2014 07:34 AM, Reiner Karlsberg wrote:
>>> The only way to support Squid caching of PageSpeed variants without
>>> repeated round trips to the origin server is using two Squids. The
>>> parent Squid would cache origin server responses while the child Squid
>>> would adapt parent's responses and cache adapted content. Needless to
>>> say, running two Squids (each with its own cache) instead of one adds
>>> significant performance/administrative overheads and complexity.
> Not such a big deal.
Agreed. For you and many others, it is not a big deal indeed.
> The more professional solution using a PageSpeed module combined with
> squid
> would only be of practical advantage for large scale users, like ISPs,
> in need of best performance and flexibility.
Exactly! The "need of best performance" [and least administrative
overhead] is what we are trying to accommodate in this case. Since many
Squid improvements during the last 5+ years are sponsored by "large
scale users", I do not think it is a good idea to reject their requests
just because they are irrelevant to others. What do you think?
Cheers,
Alex.
Received on Fri Jul 11 2014 - 15:35:06 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 11 2014 - 12:00:11 MDT