Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> writes:
[...]
> Agreed. To cut this all short. I was under the impression that we had
> proven the usefulness of add-and-remove model.
> Under the current code that 'remove' would be an event delete ("good
> enough for now") with possibilities for some future improvement
> outside the scope of this change.
Under normal circumstance, I would have done this 'tomorrow' (whatever
that means, considering that it is unclear for how much longer this
nonsense will keep me awake). Considering that 'the aggressive guy'
was finally made to deliver something (upon the immediate threat that
someone else might do it instead), I'm going to assume that this is a
done deal and won't bother this mailing list anymore except in case of
'other problems' (and even then likely not).
Received on Fri Jan 25 2013 - 02:25:02 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 25 2013 - 12:00:09 MST