Re: [PATCH] schedule connect timeouts via eventAdd

Alex Rousskov <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com> writes:
> On 01/24/2013 02:46 PM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, using
>> a more sensibly priority queue algorithm (still both extremely simple
>> to implement and 'readily available' in a canned form), insofar the
>> deficiencies of the simple one become actually relevant, makes a lot more
>> sense than devising special-case 'workarounds' for these deficiencies
>> because it is conjectured that they *might* otherwise become
>> relevant.
>
> I am all for using better queuing algorithms. However,

[...]

And I'm all for getting some actual work done instead of this
completely pointless discussion.
Received on Thu Jan 24 2013 - 22:34:34 MST