On 12.12.2012 05:02, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 03:50 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 11/12/2012 9:19 p.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
>>> If there is not any objection I will apply the latest "cert
>>> validation
>>> cache" patch to trunk.
>
>> This patch is also threaded with "#if 1 // USE_SSL_CERT_VALIDATOR"
>> just
>> like the other one and will need re-testing without it.
>
> I think we should either use proper USE_SSL_CERT_VALIDATOR
> conditional
> or make this code unconditional. Iff nobody has strong opinions about
> it, I suggest making this code unconditional (no #ifs).
>
> The certificate validator is not enabled by default and the extra
> code
> does not add a lot of performance overhead, does it?
>
Up to you guys whether the conditionals exist or not. But it definitely
will need USE_SSL around the SSL-specific code.
PS. Christos, can you please avoid even developing with the "#if 1 //
USE_BLAH" style of force-enabling. If it is worth putting the
conditionals in at all it is worth adding a ./configure option and
testing during development with that options set/unset.
Amos
Received on Wed Dec 12 2012 - 01:33:06 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Dec 12 2012 - 12:00:10 MST