Re: [PATCH] Name shared memory segments in a more portable way

On 10/25/2011 09:39 AM, Kinkie wrote:
>> Any better ideas?
> Maybe not better, but alternate: accept to depend on boost.

The patched Squid already uses the relevant Boost code to detect whether
the OS is using paths for shared segment names.

When paths must be used, Boost does not solve the problem of using the
_right_ path because that right path depends on whether we are running a
test case or Squid, which is not something Boost knows about.

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Tue Oct 25 2011 - 17:46:15 MDT