On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:00:14 +0200, Kinkie wrote:
> If you guys are OK, I'll merge the current implementation, then we
> can
> alter it post-merge.
>
> Right now what Squid does is A1->B2 for all directives except for
> max-stale, for which it does B4 (forward valueless). This is
> probably
> the worst thing that can be done.
>
> IMHVO the best thing we could do is forward things we can't parse
> as-is (A2-B3). If we change nothing we can probably also keep a copy
> of the raw directives, saves some cycles to reassemble it at
> pack-time
> .
I'm okay with an intermediary polish-only merge as long as its not
adding or changing the behaviour mess.
If it is changing behaviour then may as well make sure there are no
known bugs in the post-merge result.
Amos
Received on Tue Oct 04 2011 - 21:05:07 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Oct 05 2011 - 12:00:03 MDT