Re: [RFC] Have-Digest and duplicate transfer suppression

 On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:09:38 +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
> (But for clarity - I'm fine with what you proposed, I just wanted to
> consider whether the standards would let us do it more directly,
> which
> they -nearly- do AFAICT).
>
> -Rob

 Same. I don't mind this type of extension ...BUT...

 I think fixing bug 2112 (lack of If-None-Match support) and bug 2617
 (wrong ETag validation handling) should be done first before any
 extensions are tried. That will allow you to see who much of a problem
 (or not) the potential failure cases actually are in practice.

 Amos
Received on Thu Aug 11 2011 - 03:13:02 MDT