On 01/08/11 22:08, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 02:36 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 30/07/11 02:10, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
>>> This is a patch which solves the bug 3118. Because it is not so small I
>>> am posting it here for comments.
>>>
>>> Here is the patch description:
>>>
>>> Currently we were updating [Icap|Ecap]::TheConfig even when
>>> [icap|ecap]_enable was false, which may lead to service activation for
>>> Icap or Ecap services that should be disabled. The patch removes such
>>> services from service groups before they are activated.
>>>
>>> The patch also warns the user when an adaptation group loses some but
>>> not all of its services due to the new group cleanup code.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christos
>>
>> Can you thread some debugs statements through
>> removeService(),removeRules() please, somewhere level 4-6.
>
> OK, done
>
>>
>> What happens when a group is emptied of services and pruned after its
>> been linked to or used by AccessRule? or any other config?
>
> The AccessRule removed too.
>
>>
>> Amos
>
Okay. +1 from me, seems right.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.14 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.10Received on Tue Aug 02 2011 - 09:25:08 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 03 2011 - 12:00:03 MDT