On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:37:56 +0100, Kinkie wrote:
>> *sigh*. An unrelated fix slipped in.
>> Do you want me to recommit or is it trivial enough that it can be left
>> like this?
>>
>
> The smblib removals? its a bit far back now, but as you are the only
> comitter since it could be done.
> I can split it on the back port. I guess there is good reason to do the
> maintenance tonight while I still remember it :).
Thanks.
> On the smblib and rfcnb side... did I already point out that being 3rd
> party library and I was trying to keep it as close to the original as
> reasonable?
You didn't, but I suspected that it was due to that reason.
> Still keeping ears open for any replacement newer than 1998 :).
> Some of these removal changes look like things that might show up in only
> one of the helpers linking against those lib. Please be sure
> basic_msnt_auth and ntlm_smb_lm_auth are both being built in your test
> environment.
I grepped the whole source tree for references before removing. There were none.
-- /kinkieReceived on Wed Jan 26 2011 - 06:30:09 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 26 2011 - 12:00:05 MST