Re: Follow up on Benchmarking results for 3.1.10 vs 2.7.9

On 14/01/11 13:26, Jack Quinlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that there have been replies to this post but I am not receiving them to
> this email account? Do I need to something so that I get these replies and not
> have to go look at the mail-archive.

Did you do a full subscription to the list? anyone can post to this
list, but only subscribed members get the list-only replies.

>
> As to the replies I would be able to help test 3.1.10+ for any items or
> improvements for CPU utilization. I have just in the past week started working
> with 3.2 and I can also test and maybe work on some items.

Thank you. That is very much appreciated.

>
> I do have 3.1.10 running in lower volume envoriment at 630+ RPS and I will post
> the data tomorrow.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jack

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.10
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.4