tis 2011-01-11 klockan 17:53 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov:
> 1) N > 2 and our name is not localhost or similar.
> 2) N > 10.
I would make the latter N > 5, or perhaps even drop the "localhost or
similar" check entirely just using N > 2.
It's a good thing if the admin notices the localhost host name issue and
understands that it's a problem to chain proxies under such conditions.
> No checks for the port mode or transaction flags (intercepted,
> accelerated, etc.).
>
> In addition to the above, do a startup check for the name and warn the
> user if our name is localhost or similar.
Yes, and also each time logs are rotated so it doesn't get lost.
> Would that address all the concerns voiced so far?
Yes.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Jan 12 2011 - 01:59:58 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 12 2011 - 12:00:04 MST