On 12/01/11 12:14, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> tis 2011-01-11 klockan 11:37 +0100 skrev Fabian Hugelshofer:
>
>> What do you think about removing the special handling for Mozilla/3 and
>> Netscape/3 agents from HttpMsg.cc?
>
> +1 from me.
>
>> How large is the chance that there is still an affected browser in use?
>
> Pretty close to none. And if there are those can be fixed in their local
> configuration to disable the use of persistent connections.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
There are two cases here, the Netscape one, yes is close to none.
However as you pointed out there are download agents using Mozilla/3.0.
How certain are we that the second hack case for that agent string is
not aimed at a popular one of them?
FWIW: +1 from me, I'm game to try and kill this on performance grounds
and push to get any remaining broken agents fixed.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.10 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.4Received on Tue Jan 11 2011 - 23:57:12 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 12 2011 - 12:00:04 MST