Re: Follow up on Benchmarking results for 3.1.10 vs 2.7.9

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:10:58 +0100

fre 2011-01-07 klockan 16:49 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:

> This ticks off one more checkbox on the 2.7 obsoletion requirements (3.x
> achieving RPS parity with 2.7).

Well CPU usage on the 3.2 node was fairly higher so not quite there yet.

Version 3.1.10-20101227 51.63%
Version 2.7.STABLE9-20100923 33.42%

> Now we are just waiting for feature parity to prevent upgrade problems.

Not entirely sure we are even waiting for that.. squid-2 maintenance is
pretty much non-existing today.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Jan 10 2011 - 22:11:02 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 11 2011 - 12:00:06 MST