Re: [stringng patch] removes terminate() method from SBuf

On 09/17/2010 01:19 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> see IRC discussions 2010-09-17 for the reasons.
>
> Boils down to it not actually being needed and causing semantic problems
> when provided by SBuf().

I would not remove terminate() completely because it does provide needed
functionality. I would just make it private, document non-persistency
caveat, and call it from c_str() and other applicable methods. If it is
only used once, this becomes less important, of course, but I would
still keep the code isolated.

Cheers,

Alex.
Received on Fri Sep 17 2010 - 17:33:29 MDT