On 09/01/2010 05:36 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:33:33 -0600, Alex Rousskov
> <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>> FWIW, we have tested your patch with Co-Advisor, and it does not break
>> any non-caching cases.
>>
>
> Does that mean there *is* breakage caused somewhere as collateral damage?
> Or the rest has not been tested?
The rest have not been analyzed, and we will not be able to do that
properly at this time. I doubt caching test cases would expose any
breakage that non-caching test cases have not.
Alex.
Received on Wed Sep 01 2010 - 23:41:14 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Sep 02 2010 - 12:00:03 MDT