On 02/21/2010 08:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 20:18 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> On 02/21/2010 06:10 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
>>> sön 2010-02-21 klockan 17:10 -0700 skrev Alex Rousskov:
>>>
>>>> The only inter-process cooperation I plan to support initially is "N
>>>> processes monitoring the same http_port (and doing everything else)".
>>> I guess there will be no shared cache then?
>> Not initially, but that is the second step goal.
>
> I suggest using CARP then, to route to backends.
In the initial implementation, there are no backends. You get N
processes that do the same thing, including listening on the same http_port.
Whether it would be more efficient to do CARP or a "distributed" but
cache shared among the same squidN processes is an open question for the
second step. I would not be surprised if the answer depends on the
traffic/environment.
Alex.
Received on Mon Feb 22 2010 - 03:32:22 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 22 2010 - 12:00:07 MST