Re: [MERGE] 1/2: Populate cache_mem on disk hits

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:02:23 +0200

lör 2009-08-15 klockan 13:26 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:

> Now closed it, but I wonder, does this close or simply reduce the impact
> of bug #7?

Reduces it sligthly as a sideeffect, but I would not account for it..

> Am I right in thinking the in-memory copy gets demoted at some later
> point back to the disk store by saving the memory copy? or is the memory
> copy dropped at that point and the original disk copy used?

dropped

Regards
Henrik
Received on Sat Aug 15 2009 - 03:02:46 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 25 2009 - 12:00:06 MDT