On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 02:01 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> I'd like some
> input regarding whether to back-port the following changes:
>
> - testheaders.sh alterations (b8892 etc)
>
> We have two options here. First is the entire change, .sh script and
> all. Second is to just port the code changes, leaving the tester itself
> for 3.1-only.
I would recommend backporting essential code changes only, if any. We
already had a few examples where innocent-looking backports broke
things, hurting users and delaying v3.1 work. Let's try to raise the bar
a little and see what happens.
Thank you,
Alex.
Received on Sun Apr 06 2008 - 10:55:59 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 12:00:07 MDT