On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 13:24 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> Yes, but I think more thought needed to go into teaching the store
> about
> sparse objects (which the backend store hooks don't cover);
They don't yet, thats definitely true.
> teaching the
> store about re-populating the memory cache (which is needed for range
> request
> processing -and- for general better performance);
Needed for more that fragements. Not needed any more for range requests
than any other.
> is there any code to properly
> process range replies and spit stuff into the store.
Yes. http.cc had that last I looked.
> As I said, a lot of it hasn't been done (I don't think 60% is a
> credible
> answer) and I think "handle range requests" is something that needs to
> be
> thought of as part of a squid internal planning/discussion rather than
> something seperate.
Well sure you can assess the amount of work done/to do differently. I
think that if I sat down to do it, it would be less work to go than I've
already put in on the outside of the store.
-Rob
-- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 13:00:10 MDT