Re: 3.0.STABLE2 patch candidates

> On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 14:35 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote:
>
>> Please go to
>> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/HEAD/changesets/merge.html and
>> inspect the list of patches to merge and not merge and give your opinion
>> if you think some patch is should be given another priority or if there
>> is an error in the grouping of related patches.
>
> The following patches are listed as "to be merged" (I think), but should
> not be blindly merged until they are reviewed, polished, and committed.
>
> 11462 Bug #2230 possible fix: segmentation fault with a "pure
> virtual method called"
>
> 11461 Bug #2224 fix: reentrant debugging crashes Squid
>
> 11387 Bug #2038: check reply_body_max_size before ICAP
> 11388 Bug #2038: check reply_body_max_size before ICAP
> 11389 Bug #2038: check reply_body_max_size before ICAP
>
>
> The following patch is listed as "not to be merged", but probably should
> be merged as it is a bug fix:
>
> 11360 Assert that checklist and request are set instead of
> segfaulting as in bug 2168
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.
>
>
>

Henrik:
   is there something special to do with individual patches not to be
merged from a group of patches which as a whole are?
  The include directive group which I have just done had 3 in the middle
which you may recall fixing-removing strtok_r usage.
  For now I have made them a seperate group not-merged and gone straight
past to your strwordtok fix.

Amos
Received on Mon Feb 25 2008 - 17:01:57 MST