On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 11:31 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> ... making access to the int value an explicit call to value() instead
> of silent conversion.
How about id() instead of value()?
> But as usual I'm not expecting anyone but me will go near the code
> until its already in HEAD. :-(
Hey, I did look at your changes or we would not have this
conversation :-).
Thanks,
Alex.
Received on Sat Feb 02 2008 - 17:19:27 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 12:00:09 MST