Re: URIs for accelerators

That's kind of what I was thinking, but was balking at the extra
logic. If it's already hanging around, all the better.

On 23/01/2008, at 4:18 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> Short version: When an accelerator, Squid tends to omit the port
>> number from its idea of what the request-URI is. This screws up
>> logging, helpers, acls, etc.
>>
>> See:
>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2192
>
> Read the bug. Perhaps that should be changed to include the port if
> the port
> != the default port for the protocol?
>
> urlCanonical() has an example for dealing with that.
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial
> Squid Support -
> - $25/pm entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in
> WA -

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot@yahoo-inc.com