Re: so, 3.x VCS

On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 08:24 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> So far I've heard of 3 devs trying the bzr tree, main concern has been
> 'high' memory use (80MB) during initial pull, and that 1.0 is not all
> that wide spread in stable distribution releases.
>
> I'd like to get feedback (or an explicit 'its fine') from hno, alex and
> duane specifically before I suggest that we have consensus and are ready
> to set a date for making CVS readonly and doing a final conversion.

IMHO, we should wait until bzr 1.x is widely spread and, hence, better
tested and documented. With folks pushing for Squid 3.1 release soon and
a few large branches not integrated yet, I would rather not spend time
on learning a new VCS and struggling with relatively immature software.

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Wed Jan 16 2008 - 09:48:17 MST