On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:45:24 +0800
Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005, Evgeny Kotsuba wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:49:01 +0200 (CEST)
>> Henrik Nordstrom <hno@squid-cache.org> wrote:
>> >On Sat, 22 Oct 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> >
>> >>List of things we have thought of include in a Squid-2.6 release
>> >>include
>> >>
>>
>> So what's about to make 2.6 C++ conformable ? The thing that I
>> supposed as first thing to do before migation to C++ and 3.0
>
> Why? Squid-2.6 isn't being migrated to C++.. :P
(a) it is possible to use "C++ as C" and there are some resons for
this - more strict syntax etc.
(b) compatibilty with 3.0 reasons. As I have see there were a number
of parrallel patches to 2.5 and 3.0
SY,
EK
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
SY,
Evgeny Kotsuba
Received on Mon Oct 24 2005 - 05:47:27 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 12:00:07 MST