On Tue, Jun 08, 2004, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > I have most of the SSL server side options (things such as the
> > capath option) ported from 3.0 to 2.5. I've been a bit out of the
> > squid-dev loop lately; is it worth getting it committed to squid-2.5?
>
> I am sorry to say but this is duplicated work. All these options is
> already available in the Squid-2.5 ssl branch which still is the primary
> source for SSL developments in Squid due to internal reasons. Changes in
> the 2.5 ssl branch is then forward-ported to Squid-3.
>
> It is intentionally not committed to 2.5 to try to shift focus to Squid-3
> and to keep the "STABLE" nature of 2.5.
Ok. I'll keep it as a locally maintained branch for now.
How is squid-3 coming along? Has anyone tackled the range request problems?
I might have another crack at fixing up Robert's stmem rewrite.
-- Adrian Chadd I'm only a fanboy if <adrian@creative.net.au> I emailed Wesley Crusher.Received on Tue Jun 08 2004 - 12:13:38 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jun 30 2004 - 12:00:03 MDT