On Thu, Aug 14, 2003, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> OK for me. COSS is an experimental feature and not under code freeze
> even for Squid-2.5. Just remember to update the patches page after
> commit.
I'll do that once I've finished my rebuild code.
> If you need to touch any files outside of src/fs/coss/ then stricter
> rules apply.
I won't be. Pwomise.
> But my back of the head says why is this development not done in
> Squid-3? We need to start moving development to Squid-3 soon or
> Squid-3.0 will never receive any good amount of testing.
Because I want to deploy this as an easily reversable change on a
university cache or two.
> If there is customers involved who require Squid-2.5 then sure, 2.5 it
> is. If not I see no reason why making anything in 2.5 beyond fixing
> bugs to non-experimental features.
Well, theoretically, I should be able to easily forwardport my COSS changes
to 3.0 once I know it works. Believe me, once its running I'm going to be
looking to move to 3.0. kqueue and epoll are my next thing to sell. :)
adrian
Received on Wed Aug 13 2003 - 23:45:15 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:28 MST