Re: of possible interest to ICAP developers

From: Robert Collins <robertc@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:00:12 +1000

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> But seriously, in many aspects they are correct. Squid is not the most
> friendly environment to implement a ICAP client within, and the
> Squid-2.5 ICAP client does still have some serious issues and
> shortcomings. The interactions with the main Squid body is a little
> different, and to have it do what is actually intended will probably
> make it even more different..

Yep - thats pretty much what killed my squid 2.4 code in that direction.
The TE stuff was also impacted nastily... fortunately squid 3 should
require much less work to Do The Right Thing..

The other thing to note, is that Shweby is only targeted for 20rps.

Rob
Received on Thu Jun 19 2003 - 18:00:17 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:08 MST