Re: rproxy merges?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:12:52 +0100

On Thursday 20 February 2003 14.55, Brian Akins wrote:
> I too would like to see the rproxy stuff in HEAD. What help do you
> need Henrik?

A diff of the rproxy branch shows quite well which of the refactored
functions from the request processing the patch backs out.. and
similar refactoring should be done again.

The problem with the "old style" request processing still used by
rproxy is simply that it is a way too long function (currently 177
lines in rproxy, was closer to 200 initially). And this is further
abused by the rproxy request parser with a few goto's where really
the code should be separated into several more isolated functions.

Help is also needed in testing and evaluating the balance between
accelerator and proxy configurations.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Thu Feb 20 2003 - 13:11:31 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:19:16 MST