On Sat, 2002-12-07 at 08:56, David Nicklay wrote:
> > Thats excellent. Are you interested in putting this development into a
> > branch on sourceforge (until delay pools and deferred reads are in
> > place?)
>
> It is fine by me. Fire away.
Whats your sourceforge user id?
> >
> > I'd *love* to put this into HEAD, but can guarantee that without
> > consistent features with the other comm modules, we will get, uhm, lots
> > of 'x doesn't work' feedback.
>
> Understood. I must admit I don't entirely understand what the purpose
> of deferred reads is. An extended explanation of what its purpose is
> might help me figure out how to work it in. As for delay pools, I might
> just leave that for someone else to get working.
Well delay pools and deferred reads suck. I'll have a think about what
they really do today. Adrian really wants (and so do I) to rationalise
those code areas very very badly.
Rob
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:19:00 MST