Hi Robert,
Il 11.46 15/08/2002 Robert Collins ha scritto:
>Who here is using a development platform that does not have *easy*
>access to autoconf 2.53?
>
>I'm asking because it would be nice to fully flush the autoconf-25
>branch to HEAD, but only if it won't cause trouble for anyone.
For me is OK, now I have the opposite problem with AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS on
all my test platforms (Sparc Solaris, Cygwin and Alpha Linux).
Regards
Guido
>For distributors I don't see this causing any difficulty, because squid
>would not be the first package that requires autoconf 2.53, thus they
>already have the infrastructure in place.
>
>For end users building from source but not hacking, this doesn't affect
>them due to the use of AM_MAINTAINER_MODE.
>
>Rob
>
>
>
-
=======================================================
Serassio Guido
Via Albenga, 11/4 10134 - Torino - ITALY
E-mail: guido.serassio@serassio.it
WWW: http://www.serassio.it
Received on Thu Aug 15 2002 - 04:29:32 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:16:05 MST