Guys,
This needs to be commmitted ASAP. I didn't realise that noone had
noticed this over the last couple of weeks.
If noone objects I'll commit this to 2.4 and HEAD tonight or
tomorrow morning. I then think we should roll another release
(oops! :)
Adrian
Index: src/access_log.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /server/cvs-server/squid/squid/src/access_log.c,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -r1.68 access_log.c
--- src/access_log.c 2001/04/10 17:01:35 1.68
+++ src/access_log.c 2001/08/29 13:24:09
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@
client = inet_ntoa(al->cache.caddr);
user = accessLogFormatName(al->cache.authuser ?
al->cache.authuser : al->cache.rfc931);
- logfilePrintf(logfile, "%9d.%03d %6d %s %s/%03d %d %s %s %s %s%s/%s %s",
+ logfilePrintf(logfile, "%10d.%03d %6d %s %s/%03d %d %s %s %s %s%s/%s %s",
(int) current_time.tv_sec,
(int) current_time.tv_usec / 1000,
al->cache.msec,
Index: src/store_log.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /server/cvs-server/squid/squid/src/store_log.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 store_log.c
--- src/store_log.c 2001/02/17 07:28:50 1.22
+++ src/store_log.c 2001/08/29 13:24:09
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
* Because if we print it before the swap file number, it'll break
* the existing log format.
*/
- logfilePrintf(storelog, "%9d.%03d %-7s %02d %08X %s %4d %9d %9d %9d %s %d/%d %s %s\n",
+ logfilePrintf(storelog, "%10d.%03d %-7s %02d %08X %s %4d %9d %9d %9d %s %d/%d %s %s\n",
(int) current_time.tv_sec,
(int) current_time.tv_usec / 1000,
storeLogTags[tag],
----- End forwarded message -----
Received on Wed Aug 29 2001 - 07:27:50 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:16 MST