logd vs. Polygraph

Interesting results:

Squid+logd access.log:
[root@zope squid-logd]# wc -l /var/log/squid/access.log
  331763 /var/log/squid/access.log

cachemgr info:
Number of HTTP requests received: 698836

Polygraph:
215.24| got 646166 xactions and 0 errors

This strikes me a bit odd... I won't say logd is losing entries, but
I'm perplexed if it isn't. Note that the higher number in mgr output is
due to me not restarting Squid between the time I realized I had
forgotten to zero the access log--so I zeroed the log and restarted the
test without restarting Squid. But it does look like about half, but
not quite, half of the requests are disappearing.

I'll give it another go at a much lower request rate to see if it is a
load activated problem.

Robert Collins wrote:

> On 21 Aug 2001 18:49:25 -0500, Joe Cooper wrote:
>
>>Robert Collins wrote:
>>
>>
>>So far so good. I'm running it at 50 reqs/sec (on very modest hardware
>>that maxes at 70 on a recent aufs squid), and I'm pretty sure it's
>>catching everything. My only test for this at the moment is that I see
>>all of /my/ browser requests being logged accurately--I can't be sure
>>the polygraph requests are all being logged until I do a line count and
>>compare that to the number of requests sent.
>>
>>
>
> Oh, by the way, try killing logd - just for fun :].
>
> Rob

                                   --
                      Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
                  Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
                         http://www.swelltech.com
Received on Tue Aug 21 2001 - 21:45:56 MDT