Re: Release Schedule

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 02:54:22 +0200

Robert Collins wrote:

> > logd defenitely is NOT a 2.5 candidate in my opinion.
>
> Because it's too new and untried?

Exactly. And it is only required by CYGWIN/Windows ports. For the UNIX ports,
NTLM should still work fine. There is no more reason why a logrotate should
mess up NTLM than why it should leak NTLM helpers on aborted requests.

--
Henrik

Received on Tue Aug 21 2001 - 18:54:44 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Robert Collins: "Re: Release Schedule"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: NTLM question"
In reply to: Robert Collins: "Re: Release Schedule"
Next in thread: Robert Collins: "Re: Release Schedule"
Reply: Robert Collins: "Re: Release Schedule"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:15 MST