Oops.. fixed. It was only meant to remove the SRC_RTT case, not the
rest...
-- Henrik Andres Kroonmaa wrote: > The problem was introduced at around 18.Feb.01 with this mod (by hno): > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/squid/squid/src/acl.c.diff?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&only_with_tag=MAIN > > diff -u -r1.21 -r1.22 > --- acl.c 2001/02/09 19:52:05 1.21 > +++ acl.c 2001/02/18 11:18:47 1.22 > .. > @@ -42,7 +42,9 @@ > static void aclParseDomainList(void *curlist); > static void aclParseUserList(void **current); > static void aclParseIpList(void *curlist); > +#if UNUSED_CODE > static void aclParseIntlist(void *curlist); > +#endif > #if SQUID_SNMP > static void aclParseWordList(void *curlist); > #endif > .. > @@ -779,9 +787,11 @@ > break; > case ACL_SRC_ASN: > case ACL_MAXCONN: > case ACL_DST_ASN: > +#if SRC_RTT_NOT_YET_FINISHED > case ACL_NETDB_SRC_RTT: > aclParseIntlist(&A->data); > break; > +#endif > case ACL_URL_PORT: > case ACL_MY_PORT: > aclParseIntRange(&A->data); > > To me, it looks like above #endif was misplaced. All acl types above will > fall through to aclParseIntRange() now. But then again, enclosing some > code with UNUSED_CODE sounds like it was intentional. > > Are we in the process of converting all intList params into intRange params, > or should I recover aclParseIntlist() ? > > ------------------------------------ > Andres Kroonmaa <andre@online.ee> > CTO, Microlink Online > Tel: 6501 731, Fax: 6501 708 > Pärnu mnt. 158, Tallinn, > 11317 EstoniaReceived on Thu Jun 14 2001 - 14:04:14 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:03 MST