Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> Maybe I should try to expand on this.
> It is a manner of calling sendto() where every time but the last it's called
> with
> MSG_MORE. If I understood correctly, it causes the kernel to aggressively
> optimize
> network operations, because it knows that there is more data to come (i.e.
> optimizing
> packetization, using jumbo frames or similar systems).
Which is almost what I thought it was.
Should make a difference for the first packets on a cache hit. For
subsequent packets/blocks of data the difference is probably quite
minimal.
-- HenrikReceived on Mon Jun 11 2001 - 14:06:48 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:03 MST