Re: storeio API change, again? :)

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001, Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm implementing an async disk io library in an attempt to
> > tidy up some of the evilness and code duplication that
> > exists.
> >
> > The main trouble is that I want to implement an async
> > create()/open() but the storeio code assumes that the
> > storeCreate() / storeOpen() are sync.
> >
> > Does anyone here have a problem with me making storeCreate() /
> > storeOpen() properly async? This will solve a *lot* of issues
> > I'm having trying to fit this in, and it'll also make
> > Kevin's job a tad bit easier in his sfs code.
>
> I have none :)
> However, I'm one of the less active folks on the main squid code,
> so my vote has a relative value :)

Oh, thats not how it works. Your vote has a relative value compared
to the number of people who vote. So far its one for one in my
favour - your vote is doing pretty well. :-)

Adrian

-- 
Adrian Chadd			"How could we possibly use sex to get
<adrian@creative.net.au>	  what we want?
			 	   Sex _IS_ what we want!" -- Fraser