Re: HTTP/1.1?

Adrian Chadd wrote:

> I'll work with Robert to get the newhttp code up and working happily,
> and then I think we should all sit down and plan what we can do with it.
> Its going to be a big task to rewrite the storage manager and throw
> in all the nice HTTP/1.1 compliant things like TE, Proper vary/etag
> support and decent range request handling, but I think it'd be worth
> it.

It will.

> People have indicated to me that full HTTP/1.1 compliance and
> flexible logging/user tracking/filtering schemes is what makes them
> run off with $COMMERCIAL_VENDOR .. :-)

Funny, as last time I heard Squid was actually the one who was closest
to HTTP/1.1 compliance, but maybe some commercial guys have worked
harder on HTTP/1.1 compliance in the last 6+ months..

--
Henrik