I think we should have quoted as in "quoted". The
"/path/to/included/file" is ugly and can be done a lot more intuitively,
so there is no need for the two to collide.
-- Henrik Robert Collins wrote: > > What is quite badly needed is a good parser that supports a reasonable > > configuration file syntax rules: > > > > * Quoted strings, to allow for spaces and similar things > Tick. (Done) (I used the url quoting syntax). > > * Backquote for continuation lines > Can do > > * Includes, not only element includes. > Tick. (Done) > > Rob > > > -- > > Henrik > > > > Robert Collins wrote: > > > > > > Would backquote be a good thing? It'll be trivial to add > > to the generic > > > modules parsing code. That won't Werner's question of course :] > > > > > > Rob > >Received on Fri May 11 2001 - 15:43:51 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:01 MST